Taking advantage of new technologies like Electrolysis and Servo.Our add-on ecosystem has evolved through incremental, organic growth over the years, but there are some modernizations to Firefox that require some foundational changes to support: Pale Moon however, clearly respects your privacy and Moonchild seems to respect your privacy as well which is a real bonus for me.Īnyways, those are just my reasons.Today we are announcing some major upcoming changes to Firefox add-ons. Of course, we all know how bad Chrome is with privacy, but Firefox too (Cliqz) can be a bit sp00ky sometimes and I don't particularly like that fact. Firefox and Chrome are both very resource and ram intensive and subsequently don't do well in that category, whilst Pale Moon does really well on low end and old hardware. I need a browser that'll work and run fast on very low end hardware.

Also, I seriously hate Firefox Quantum's UI and that's one of the big things which drove me away from FF Quantum.įor some who regularly uses PCs with equal to or sub 2gigs of ram, Firefox Quantum and Chrome don't cut. Aside from that, the menu in Pale Moon is a lot nicer to use than in Firefox and Chrome. Since I love aero's glassy look, naturally this was great news for me as Windows 7 user. Pale Moon can actually adapt to the UI of it's host OS, looking metro-like in Windows 8.x, aero-like in Windows 7, and XP/Classic-like in Windows XP. Pale Moon has a clear victory over both Chrome and Firefox in this category. Pale Moon was markedly faster than both Chrome or Firefox, especially the former- browsing all of a sudden became a lot more tolerable for me as opposed to what it was like with Chrome and Firefox (FF wasn't too bad, still not great). I'm a Pale Moon (New Moon on XP) user through and through, I don't use any other browsers save experimentation and occasionally IE for battery life (IE excels at that).

Pale moon vs chrome pc security channel